Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013
Player |
FGA |
TS% |
%Shots at Rim |
FG% at Rim |
%Assisted at Rim |
%Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
%Assisted 2pt Jumpers |
%Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
%assisted 3pt |
FTA/FGA |
FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Daniel Munoz |
182 |
0.443 |
19% |
44% |
7% |
46% |
36% |
13% |
35% |
27% |
94% |
0.26 |
85% |
Stephen Lumpkins |
172 |
0.527 |
63% |
52% |
46% |
35% |
38% |
48% |
2% |
0% |
--- |
0.62 |
72% |
John Schoof |
123 |
0.702 |
20% |
46% |
27% |
17% |
29% |
50% |
63% |
56% |
100% |
0.24 |
90% |
Tony Wroblicky |
104 |
0.545 |
61% |
70% |
52% |
39% |
32% |
54% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.40 |
50% |
Blake Jolivette |
92 |
0.393 |
16% |
60% |
11% |
74% |
25% |
18% |
10% |
56% |
100% |
0.11 |
90% |
Jesse Reed |
67 |
0.441 |
21% |
57% |
50% |
25% |
24% |
50% |
54% |
28% |
90% |
0.39 |
62% |
Mike Bersch |
56 |
0.421 |
14% |
50% |
0% |
4% |
0% |
--- |
82% |
28% |
100% |
0.04 |
50% |
Austin Carroll |
31 |
0.262 |
0% |
--- |
--- |
19% |
17% |
100% |
81% |
20% |
60% |
0.10 |
0% |
Kyle Kager |
19 |
0.436 |
26% |
60% |
0% |
47% |
11% |
0% |
26% |
60% |
100% |
0.05 |
0% |
Marko Vasic |
13 |
0.594 |
23% |
67% |
100% |
15% |
0% |
--- |
62% |
50% |
100% |
0.08 |
0% |
Daniel Fisher |
10 |
0.457 |
60% |
50% |
100% |
40% |
50% |
100% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.20 |
0% |
Warren Flood |
3 |
0.000 |
0% |
--- |
--- |
100% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.00 |
--- |
Zach Elcano |
2 |
0.500 |
50% |
100% |
0% |
50% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.00 |
--- |
TEAM |
874 |
0.498 |
32% |
56% |
40% |
36% |
30% |
34% |
31% |
37% |
96% |
0.31 |
70% |
Shot Type |
% of shots |
FG% |
% of Shots Blocked |
Unblocked FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
At Rim |
27% |
63% |
7% |
67% |
2pt Jumpers |
39% |
36% |
6% |
39% |
3pt Shots |
34% |
41% |
0% |
41% |
This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
6% |
43% |
39% |
50% |
24% |
20% |
37% |
33% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
32% |
50% |
30% |
62% |
36% |
32% |
34% |
40% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
2% |
59% |
50% |
88% |
6% |
100% |
44% |
14% |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
44% |
38% |
23% |
54% |
42% |
26% |
35% |
28% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
4% |
57% |
63% |
47% |
11% |
0% |
26% |
71% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
2% |
29% |
21% |
0% |
50% |
14% |
29% |
50% |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
1% |
75% |
25% |
50% |
38% |
67% |
38% |
67% |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
9% |
50% |
28% |
69% |
39% |
32% |
33% |
37% |
This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against AMERICAN UNIVERSITY.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
15% |
69% |
24% |
69% |
33% |
28% |
44% |
67% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
25% |
46% |
26% |
59% |
42% |
38% |
33% |
31% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
6% |
66% |
28% |
45% |
30% |
42% |
42% |
65% |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
37% |
45% |
23% |
55% |
43% |
40% |
34% |
30% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
8% |
76% |
55% |
85% |
18% |
36% |
27% |
56% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
1% |
40% |
30% |
33% |
40% |
75% |
30% |
0% |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
2% |
38% |
42% |
40% |
25% |
33% |
33% |
25% |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
6% |
34% |
22% |
44% |
46% |
21% |
32% |
31% |
Updated 2013-04-09